29,339 total views, 1 views today
They keep saying John Mahama ruined Ghana for four years, but in those four years, Ghanaians had modern hospitals in our districts, renovated regional hospitals, built an ultramodern teaching hospital, new roads and schools. Ghanaians had affordable food, fuel, regular salary and efficient National Health Insurance scheme, CHPS compounds.
Moreover, John Mahama did not spend millions of cedis of our taxes on establishing commissions to defending and clearing members of his government caught red-handed in corruption.
Perhaps John Mahama ruined Ghana by reviving the Kumasi Shoe Factory, by renovating our ports and building new structures including the terminal 3 attracting first-class airline operators into Ghana, by building the Kasoa and Nkrumah interchange. He ruined Ghana by finishing the Atuabo Gas factory and adding more megawatts of power to what he met.
Hahahahahah others say Nana’s two years is better than John’s four years. Isn’t that interesting. Nana is still recommissioning Mahama’s projects and taking credit for some of them yet, his fanatics claim he is the best.
Nana has done better than Mahama because he has borrowed close to Ghc 100 billion but cannot point to one project executed by his administration. Mahama borrowed to build roads, hospitals, schools, clinics and CHPS compounds, ports and roads, railways and bridges.
Hahahahahah Nana has done better than Mahama because Mahama fixed the dumsor crisis but has reappeared under Nana
Nana has done better because under him, teachers write their exams on the blackboard…under Mahama teachers were provided with modern computers and teaching aids
Nana has performed better than Mahama because journalists and prominent citizens are being killed…
Source: Ohenenana Obonti Krow