No Patriotism in the Market Place; GUTA has no Case Against Foreign Traders – Franklin Cudjoe

“I don’t care whether it is a Chinese ‘dragon’ or a Nigerian ‘agbalagba’ that is selling to me on the market. I am only interested in buying cheaper and quality so that I can save some of my money. …When you hear GUTA and co saying that Nigerians should leave; apart from being xenophobic, they are attacking the wrong horse.”

The above statement was made by the Chief Executive Officer of IMANI Center for Policy and Education, Franklin Cudjoe in a presentation at the 2020 edition of the African Journalists for Economic Opportunities Training (AJEOT 2020) of which I was a participant. The training programme which is organized yearly by the Institute for Liberty and Policy Innovation (ILAPI), is aimed at exposing participants to the principles of classical liberalism such as free market economics, rule of law, and individual liberty among others.

Being a Ghanaian journalist who has on a number of occasions covered a number of stories concerning agitations by GUTA against foreign traders, it sounded a lot more controversial and unpatriotic for me to accept what I was hearing. I was initially taken aback and felt a bit disappointed with the presentation.

However, the rigorousness involved in the selection of the participants for the programme, of which a lot of intellectual discipline was expected of me, I decided to bring myself to appreciate the point being put across by the Founding President of the policy and education think tank dedicated to the promotion of the institutions of a free society across Africa. In the end it paid off.

This piece is trying to explore and put into perspective, the realities of a free market situation in a continuously expanding regional integration as against the position held by the Ghanaian traders, in the context of the law, patriotism and economics as espoused by Franklin Cudjoe.

Trading across borders

Trading across borders with neighbors is a matter Ghana seems to be struggling with. The frustration of foreign people importing stuffs into the country to come and compete with indigenous traders has made the headlines a number of times with members of the Ghana Union of Traders Association (GUTA) always seen up in arms against these foreign traders.

The argument has always been that the foreign traders have been violating the country’s laws which reserves some areas designated as markets for indigenous Ghanaian traders. Foreign traders are however permitted to import goods into the country and sell them wholesale to Ghanaians, but are not permitted to retail them on the market.

But the Head of the policy think tank thinks that any such laws that prohibits trade in such a murky circumstance of contradictions without taking other important related factors into consideration, does not make sense.

Contradictions in ECOWAS Protocol and the national legal framework

While at the sub-regional level, the Economic Community of West African States [ECOWAS] Protocol on free movement of persons, right of residence and establishment in 1979 mandated all member states to stop demanding visas and residence permits, and allow West Africans to undertake commercial activities within their territories, at the national level the Ghana Immigration Act (Act 573) and the Ghana Investment Promotion Centre (GIPC) law (Act 865) have set conditions for investment and other economic activities of immigrants in the country.

However, with respect to foreign investment, the investment law (GIPC Act) requires an immigrant to have a minimum liquidity of US$ 1million to invest. Although the investment laws of Ghana do not prohibit foreigners from investing in any aspect of the economy, the GIPC Act has specified economic activities that are wholly reserved for indigenes in Section 27 of the Act.

According to this section, a person who is not a citizen shall not invest or participate in: the sale of goods or provision of services in a market, petty trading or hawking or selling of goods in a stall at any place (GIPC Act, 2013).

“When you say an area should be preserved for the Ghanaian because it is called a market and these are no go areas. Even if it is cast in law, I am only saying that that law doesn’t make sense. Do you know why? Because as a foreigner, I can now say that okay, I will go and bring a container full of the same goods and then hop them around shops in the country and sell them off cheap. I will be undercutting the prices in the market so nobody would go to the market.”
Cost of doing business for the Ghanaian trader

According to the Chief Executive Officer of the Policy Think Tank, IMANI Africa, the Ghanaian traders have no business blaming the foreign traders for doing their legitimate business in the country. He argues that the Ghanaian consumer is a rational human being who would always go for quality products at a cheaper price, no matter who sells to him. He therefore advised the traders to rather direct their anger at the unfavorable policy conditions resulting in the high cost of doing business in the country.

In spite of being one of the biggest attractors of foreign direct investment in Africa, Ghana’s bureaucratic processes and high cost of doing business remain a cause of concern. Among a number of factors, high cost of credit remains one of the major headaches for Ghanaian traders.

“The Chinese or the Nigerian is not the problem. It is your own rules, it is your own taxes, it is your own cost of doing business which is higher. The protocols allow people to come into the country and trade. You say they shouldn’t trade in our markets because the markets are meant for you. Well, as a Ghanaian I am interested in buying produce in the market at a cheaper rate so that I can save some of my money,” he said.

Poor Customer Care and Marketing Skills
Aside the policy issues, the IMANI Boss also faulted the Ghanaian trader on negative customer relations and poor selling skills which gives the foreign trader an advantage over them.

He said, “Even the way we relate to traders in Ghana. When you are going to buy something in the market, customer care is even so poor. Look at how the Nigerians treat you when you get to the market. They treat you nicely and we never learn. Apart from the fact that the cost of doing business is high, there are those soft issues that we are not good at all. Culturally, we are very bad at selling.”

Read More :Africa seeks debt cancellation, new paradigm in world economic order

Parallel importation argument doesn’t hold
He further emphasized that, “In economics we don’t eat patriotism. Patriotism doesn’t matter when you are dealing with issues of life, bread and butter. If you earn 10 Cedis and you know that you will spend 1 Cedi on bread and all of a sudden you can spend 50 Pesewas on bread and save 50 Pesewas, as a rational human being, which one will you choose? Won’t you choose the one that gives you 50 pesewas but the same quality and you can save the 50 Pesewas?

“I mean, the people who trade in our market, their thinking is that we are Ghanaians so we should patronize Ghanaian products. I will patronize Ghanaian products that are made in Ghana and nowhere else, even if they are quite pricy. And don’t tell me to buy the same product because a Ghanaian has brought it from China, and a Nigerian has brought it from China and they are all selling in the same market and one is cheaper than the other. You should ask yourself, why is it that the Nigerian own is cheaper on top of paying taxes before the goods get here.”

I guess, having read this far, you would agree with me that the comments made by the Founding President and the CEO of IMANI Africa, Frankkin Kudjoe is not out of place after all. At the end of the AJEOT programme, where I was honored with an award as the most active participant, I came to the conclusion that the President of the Institute for Liberty and Policy Innovation (ILAPI), Peter Bismark and his dedicated team deserve commendation for putting such a training programme together for journalists and public policy analysts on a yearly basis to help advance the course of individual liberty and a free market society in Africa.

By Clement Akoloh 

The writer is an (AJEOT 2020) alumnus, a Senior Correspondent with the Parliament of Ghana and the Managing Editor of and
Contact him via Email, [email protected]

GOT A STORY? Share with us. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] WhatsApp: +233(0)244822034

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

GOT A STORY? Share with us. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] WhatsApp: +233(0)244822034
  1. […] Read More: No Patriotism in the Market Place; GUTA has no Case Against Foreign Traders – Franklin Cudjoe […]

  2. […] Read More: No Patriotism in the Market Place; GUTA has no Case Against Foreign Traders – Franklin Cudjoe […]

  3. […] Read More: No Patriotism in the Market Place; GUTA has no Case Against Foreign Traders – Franklin Cudjoe […]

  4. […] Read More: No Patriotism in the Market Place; GUTA has no Case Against Foreign Traders – Franklin Cudjoe […]

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More